| What Pro-test for Science is all about... Following in the footsteps of the Pro-Test group in Oxford, UK, students and scientists at UCLA have pledged to stand up against the lies and misinformation of animal rights groups, and the violence of extremist organizations. They have formed the group Pro-Test for Science (formerly UCLA Pro-Test), which stands for science, reasoned discourse and the belief that life-saving medical research must continue without violence and harassment from misguided activists. The group was founded by Professor J. David Jentsch, and he has been joined by a number of other scientists who have also been the victims of animal rights extremism in California. With the support of Americans for Medical Progress, Speaking of Research and Pro-Test UK, we aim to challenge this climate of fear that has descended upon researchers in California and beyond! If you support our mission to promote humane biomedical research and to combat animal rights extremism, consider raising your voice by signing the Pro-Test petition. |
| Our Mission... We are an organization composed of scientists, researchers, academics, students and members of the general public. Our central mission is to: Encourage scientists and non-scientists to stand up and support the critical role that humane and well-regulated animal research plays in medical advances of the past, present and future. Dispel myths and falsehoods propagated by animal rights groups regarding the true nature of animals research. Provide an academic forum in which civilized discussion surrounding the animal research issue can take place. Combat fear and support victims of violence, harassment and threats used to coerce researchers and institutions carrying out medical research with animals. If you would like to communicate with us or to join our efforts, email us at pro.test.for.science@gmail.com. |
 | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  |
UPDATE: Joint Statement by
Bruin for Animals and Pro-
Test for Science
In an effort to establish a dialogue between those holding
different opinions on the role of animals in research, Bruins for
Animals and Pro-Test for Science held what, in our judgement
and many of our colleagues, was an extremely positive and
informative discussion on the science and ethics of biomedical
research using animals.
In the weeks leading to the event, a handful of animal rights
activists, with the only goal of preventing this dialogue from
happening, harassed UCLA investigators at their homes and
ran a campaign of intimidation through websites. Organizers
and panelists on both sides of the event forcefully condemned
these attempts at derailing our meeting. We prevailed.
Dialogue prevailed.
Unfortunately, this outcome has not been universally received.
Some appear determined to continue with their attempts at
interfering with this fresh direction the debate is taking. In a
move that defies logic, these activists are now suggesting
children are legitimate targets of their protests.
Nobody should tolerate these renewed attempts at silencing our
voices. Scientists and animal rights activists who are
committed to an open dialogue that will allow the public to
become better educated on these important issues should now
stand up together, publicly condemn such actions and defend
the right of everyone to express freely their opinions.
Anyone willing to participate in an honest, rational and open
dialogue is welcome at the table.
Jill Ryther, Kristy Anderson, David Jentsch and Dario Ringach
Bruin for Animals and Pro-
Test for Science
In an effort to establish a dialogue between those holding
different opinions on the role of animals in research, Bruins for
Animals and Pro-Test for Science held what, in our judgement
and many of our colleagues, was an extremely positive and
informative discussion on the science and ethics of biomedical
research using animals.
In the weeks leading to the event, a handful of animal rights
activists, with the only goal of preventing this dialogue from
happening, harassed UCLA investigators at their homes and
ran a campaign of intimidation through websites. Organizers
and panelists on both sides of the event forcefully condemned
these attempts at derailing our meeting. We prevailed.
Dialogue prevailed.
Unfortunately, this outcome has not been universally received.
Some appear determined to continue with their attempts at
interfering with this fresh direction the debate is taking. In a
move that defies logic, these activists are now suggesting
children are legitimate targets of their protests.
Nobody should tolerate these renewed attempts at silencing our
voices. Scientists and animal rights activists who are
committed to an open dialogue that will allow the public to
become better educated on these important issues should now
stand up together, publicly condemn such actions and defend
the right of everyone to express freely their opinions.
Anyone willing to participate in an honest, rational and open
dialogue is welcome at the table.
Jill Ryther, Kristy Anderson, David Jentsch and Dario Ringach